Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/pcifront: fix freeing of device

From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:23:39 +0100

Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:25:16 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Zqfm3B6jgy+TBxDs9S2Ac7C4oWz91WvIH7qd7buoH6zDt+fhFNnbbX6u9Fpmxrx/Qv 0O+6TQnxCfP4UCQr0hcAkWQheNfRazh++36KvgWMXhG44BpvPu+MVv9smI24RFxzCTJC v9bJF0kAOCmJbGncASVH3vDMs9GDc6jMfUCJw=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Thread-index: Actjvvlw3OV9M6L6iU2a08N1jUdNxw==

Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/pcifront: fix freeing of device

On 04/10/2010 13:22, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 04.10.10 at 13:46, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Are the two patches you sent out for 2.6.18? If so, you need to make it >> clear. There are several Linux trees now and I'm ignoring Linux patches by >> default. > > Yes, they are. If distinguishing by the recipient (xen-devel vs. Jeremy) > isn't sufficient, I'll state this explicitly in the future. Yes, put it in the subject line, thanks. K. > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.