Re: [Xen-devel] Testing the kernels

[Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 06:54:18PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Testing the kernels"):
> > Regressions?
> 
> Well, not really regressions in the view of the testing system,
> because the "tested" kernel tree was only just created so has all the
> failures, and xen-unstable was pushed manually recently.
> 
> > > Can this be done in a way that doesn't involve waiting for you ?  The
> > > testing system obviously pushes automatically and it would be good to
> > > publish those things in the right places without further manual
> > > intervention.
> > 
> > Yes.  I was planning on setting up a cronjob on kernel.org to update the
> > branch once we'd sorted out all the details.
> 
> OK.  I can arrange to prod some script of yours if you prefer.
> 
> > > When we update the kernel version we intend to use, this should be a
> > > fast forward update and gated though the testing in the ordinary way,
> > > so it should update the same tag.  Do you agree ?
> > 
> > Hm. I was hoping at some point to have two kernels going through
> > testing.  We're planning on supporting 2.6.32 for a long time, so we
> > should keep testing that.  But I'd also like to start tracking upstream
> > more closely (starting with .36) which we should also test.
> 
> OK, I guess I could have a different branch for my testing which
> tracks a different branch of yours.  I've called this one "linux",
> as in
>   Subject: [linux test] 2057: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
> but perhaps I should rename it ?
> 

If it's 2.6.32.x I guess it should say linux-2.6.32.x ? 

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel