[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] wiki page on 10G SRIOV


  • To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: kishore kumar <bodkekumar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:15:40 -0700
  • Cc: wangalalei <girl111_2002@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:16:43 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Su18hOlKC6Lhx3q5FyYXyd5HuvOHvW5dG0WhvOKQOrJSjl85LoctkdfBnr74iEcpaW z0aMsEcf9qUjt6RBwb0phseEXtSWItNxQVgO9L/xzxsEGSbXYMTJjy1P31GT+BtrnuzL iC9Nqsd3MqUGXCGcajMrXap3DeeKop0hNuuyg=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>


Hello Everyone,
Â
I am facing a strange issue with my 10G 82599 PCIe device.
Â
The Device Id has to be 0x10FB for SRIOV to function properly, But all of sudden the Device IDÂstarted showing me as 0x10D8, and because of this the SRIOV feature is not working and I cannot assign the Virtual Function to my guest.
Â
When I did lspci command it is showing me as Intel Corporation Unknown device 10d8 (rev 01). Previously it was showing me Intel Corporation 82599EB Gigabit Networking with 10FB, and I was able to assign the Virtual Function to my guest.
Â
I googled and found out that the device ID 0x10D8 is a 82599 Unprogrammed device.
Â
Can any one please let me know what is happening here and how to recover back from this?
I am totally blocked for 2 days because of this issue.
Â
Thank You.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:17:30AM +0000, wangalalei wrote:
> Â Âhi all:
>
> Â Â Â i read intel 82576 card datasheet,and finding it saying that the 82576
> Â Âcan set the vf's bandwidth,
> Â Âbut when i test this card,i can not find any parameter to it
> Â Â Â any one else notice this problem? or anyone knows whether the 82576
> Â Âcard can control its vf's bandwidth?
>

I think bandwidth management is a work-in-progress by Intel..

-- Pasi

> Â Âalaleiwang
>
> Â Â--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Â ÂDate: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:35:57 -0700
> Â ÂSubject: Re: [Xen-users] wiki page on 10G SRIOV
> Â ÂFrom: bodkekumar@xxxxxxxxx
> Â ÂTo: pasik@xxxxxx
> Â ÂCC: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Â ÂYeah, I configured 64 Virtual Functions in DOM-0 Âand passthru 1 VF to
> Â Âassign it to the guest. ÂIt worked for me.
>
> Â ÂI assign static IP to my guest and tried to ping the remote machine. It
> Â Âworked for me.
>
> Â ÂBut I am wondering that ping to DOM-0 from guest makes any sense here?
> Â ÂCan you let me know on this? Âping worked though from guest to DOM-0 as
> Â Âwell.
>
> Â ÂOn Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Pasi KÃârkkÃâinen <[1]pasik@xxxxxx>
> Â Âwrote:
>
> Â Â ÂOn Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:56:28AM -0700, kishore kumar wrote:
> Â Â Â> Â ÂHi All,
> Â Â Â>
> Â Â Â> Â ÂCan any one please let me know if there is a WIKI page which talks
> Â Â Âabout
> Â Â Â> Â Âhow to configure SRIOV in Xen and use Physical Functions Âand
> Â Â ÂVirtual
> Â Â Â> Â ÂFunctions ?
> Â Â Â>
> Â Â Â> Â ÂI searched xen wiki, but could not find.
> Â Â Â>
>
> Â Â ÂEach virtual function should be a separate PCI device, so you can
> Â Â Âpassthru
> Â Â Âthem like any other normal PCI device.
>
> Â Â ÂDid you get it to work?
> Â Â Â-- Pasi
>
> Â Â--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  ÂÃ**ÃâÂ+Ã**ÃÅÂ+Ã*ÂàÃ*ÂÃÅ*ÃÅÂÃ*ÅÃ*ÂÃÅÅ,Ã**Ã*ÂMSNÃÅÂÃÅ Ã**ÃÂ*!
> Â Â[2]ÃÂ*Ã*ÂÃÅ*ÃÅÅÃÅ*
>
> References
>
> Â ÂVisible links
> Â Â1. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
> Â Â2. http://3g.msn.cn/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.