[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN][vNUMA][PATCH 7/9] Build NUMA HVM


  • To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 23:07:35 -0700
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:08:29 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uYUc7U4kD4ea3EwUzgHmLg0pxzBVRUR4Uz7RCjUPxidbxAWEzxshe1tgBjtAfSzhVL UDz1Vb51nBsjhwQsfj6BueHaMhxjKLmKYK1R5JIL8J/vuWxOhc/0+sZlrbqQIdGKMtaQ urlHluBwm/BDzlx/8HQ+9iM9xvBCAxc2G85QQ=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

WIth the NUMA allocator, pod is simply disabled as of now. This debug
statement seeped through when testing that. Will take care of it :)
However, I did test PoD for any regressions.

-dulloor

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:55 AM, George Dunlap
<George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What's this line for:
>
>>+    if (nr_pages > target_pages)
>>     {
>>-        PERROR("Could not allocate memory.");
>>-        goto error_out;
>>+        pod_mode = 1;
>>+        mem_flags |= XENMEMF_populate_on_demand;
>>+        IPRINTF("I SHOULDN'T BE HERE !!\n");
>
> It's not clear what this patch does to the PoD logic... does it still
> need some work, or should I try harder to grok it?  Have you tested it
> in PoD mode?
>
>  -George
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.