Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe xenfs if it not be loaded

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 06/21/2010 06:28 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 21/06/2010 15:05, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe
>> xenfs if it not be loaded"):
>>     
>>> It should just be sufficient to explicitly mount /proc/xen, which will
>>> trigger a modprobe if necessary.
>>>       
>> That sounds like a Nak of the patch to me.  Unfortunately it has
>> already been applied (21641).
>>     
> I can revert it.
>   

I think so.

> Should I leave tools patches unapplied for a week, perhaps?
>   

You mean the policy is that if a patch is not interesting enough to draw
comment, you'll accept it by default after a week?  What about waiting
until there are either positive or negative comments, and suggesting the
poster ping if the patch is uncommented on after a day or two?

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel