[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 12/12] Unplug emulated disks and nics



On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > +#if (defined(CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND) || \
> > +           defined(CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND_MODULE)) && \
> > +           (defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI) || \
> > +            defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI_MODULE))
> > +           printk(KERN_INFO "Netfront and the Xen platform PCI driver have 
> > "
> > +                           "been compiled for this kernel: unplug emulated 
> > NICs.\n");
> > +           xen_emul_unplug |= XEN_UNPLUG_ALL_NICS;
> > +#endif
> > +#if (defined(CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND) || \
> > +           defined(CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND_MODULE)) && \
> > +           (defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI) || \
> > +            defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI_MODULE))
> > +           printk(KERN_INFO "Blkfront and the Xen platform PCI driver have 
> > "
> > +                           "been compiled for this kernel: unplug emulated 
> > disks.\n"
> > +                           "You might have to change the root device\n"
> > +                           "from /dev/hd[a-d] to /dev/xvd[a-d]\n"
> > +                           "in your root= kernel command line option\n");
> > +           xen_emul_unplug |= XEN_UNPLUG_ALL_IDE_DISKS;
> > +#endif
> 
> Wow. Can you move those checks to the header file and make it deal with
> the #ifdef and setting of xen_emul_unplug?
> 

I tried, but it didn't improve the elegance of the code, mainly because I
want to keep the printk in place, so the code would look very much like
this, but instead of being in platform-pci-unplug.c would be in
platform_pci.h.


> > +   }
> > +   /* Now unplug the emulated devices */
> > +   if (xen_platform_pci_enabled && !(xen_emul_unplug & XEN_UNPLUG_IGNORE))
> > +           outw(xen_emul_unplug, XEN_IOPORT_UNPLUG);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init parse_xen_emul_unplug(char *arg)
> > +{
> > +   char *p, *q;
> > +
> > +   for (p = arg; p; p = q) {
> > +           q = strchr(arg, ',');
> > +           if (q)
> > +                   *q++ = '\0';
> > +           if (!strcmp(p, "all"))
> > +                   xen_emul_unplug |= XEN_UNPLUG_ALL;
> 
> strncmp..
> 

is it really needed considering that we know that both strings are NULL
terminated and one of them is a constant?



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.