[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel


  • To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:35:34 -0400
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:37:34 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=r9EFbfZSgvyOp+DBSRV7GeeMhg2kdAElmdlJpc3dkuubZnZlBaLIbOyskJE9lvWVTK yqOvbs6NokKFTKpGFvJFi80H0B1y/+yKWJ8Z3Uemn2fVBiyeo8VSwc+po7tlC8wT+K2W 2oywwI8lXZHB3b0st4BQEGg/GuAtYPl2l+pYs=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 15.06.10 at 15:49, Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> SSDT and DSDT dumps attached.
>
> _SB.PCI0._CRS clears bit 16 of indirect register 0x2e, i.e. it masks pin 15
> of the second IO-APIC. The motivation of this is unclear to me (and
> can probably only be explained by the writers of that code) - perhaps
> a workaround for some erratum?
>
> Jan
>
>

Hmm, so could there be a Xen-based workaround in the interim, such as
bypassing the code page that is triggering this? It seems like that
may not provide too much relief given the nature of the issue.

This is running the latest bios and I don't see anything in the recent
errata pertaining to ACPI in the last number of releases.

Cris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.