[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?

  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:37:26 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:38:22 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SRgx5sD//6rt0G8tWpNKrw8Dn783BuQEYO8MjuKz5QKgf8MX0fqQGLtN6uC5YOPKX5 pUvCDhYGmWhQoYMWsIZckw2hbcwYhLArpr9yfXFwRkUETfLRjiy5PFz7Q/Y41kVjCw3w d1OgrtSt9H+bnHJbQ2FGOlBAYjiPRHhR1+RBM=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

If we are to add new guest configuration parameters, is it enough to
make it work with xl ?
Sorry, if I missed any past mails regarding this, but (in general)
should people think xl or xm or both ?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.