[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] blkfront pvops updates, v2

[Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 18:16 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 04/30/2010 03:01 PM, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> >  * Found the switch [again] for HG to strip those headers -- cheers.
> >   
> 
> The ideal for me is if you have a git tree I can pull from, 

There's still hope to get one. Didn't happen yet. Ian?

> but failing
> that, the most useful format for mailed patches is something that "git
> am" can accept.  It looks like it will take the attachments OK, but it
> cats the mail body onto the attachment, so it ends up with the commit
> comment twice.  If you have a non-mangling mailer, it's probably easiest
> if you just include the full commit comment+patch in the mail body (it's
> easier to comment on the patches in mail that way too).

Okay, whatever works.

> > Oh beautiful. This apparently strips the first comment line together
> > with the patch header. Looks buggy.
> >
> > F*! 
> >
> > Sorry. Fix/resend?
> >   
> 
> Did it lose something other than the subject?  

No.

> git am picked it up from
> the email Subject: line, so it didn't matter it was missing from the
> patch comment itself.

Good.

Thanks,
Daniel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel