[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
In fact it means if i am on Ubuntu HVM - patch set has to applied to Ubuntu's kernel
and "initrd" rebuilt. HVM reloaded
if i am on Fedora Hvm - patch set has to applied to Fedora's kernel and "initrd" rebuilt
HVM reloaded
Boris.
--- On Mon, 3/15/10, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stefano Stabellini"
<Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 1:27 PM
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 02:13 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > Yes. That's what i see on my box.
> >
>
> OK, over to you Stefano. Why is Boris seeing an instacrash in dom0 with
> your patches in place?
>
As you might know already, the new patch series works as domU kernel
only so this problem doesn't exist anymore.
I decided to chase this bug anyway and it turns out that I was just
missing:
@@ -1345,6 +1346,8 @@ void __init xen_guest_init(void)
int r;
uint64_t callback_via;
+ if (xen_pv_domain())
+ return;
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
