[Xen-devel] Re: TIME_SLOP vs. timer_slop

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/02/2010 11:41, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> is there a reason why schedule.c and timer.c don't both use the latter,
> command line controllable value?
> 
> Also, aren't the comment and code in vcpu_periodic_timer_work() out
> of sync with the actual implementation in timer.c in that a timer will
> never expire early (with timer_slop only being used to set an upper
> bound on the expiry range)?

Yes, true. Thanks for that; it's now fixed as c/s 20921.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel