Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Any idea when this last worked in xen-unstable?

 -- Keir

On 12/01/2010 15:18, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Attempt to load Xen 4.0-rc1 with 2.6.31.6 pvops kernel on top of Ubuntu 9.04
> server. ( Xen 3.4.3-rc1-pre loads fine with any kernel) :-
> dmesg :-
> 
> . . . . . . . . 
> 
> [  499.890371] xend[1609]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895af sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  499.905480] xend[1612]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  499.934416] xend[1620]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  499.949121] xend[1623]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  499.988220] xend[1633]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  500.013995] xend[1641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  500.053252] xend[1652]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  500.069849] xend[1657]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  500.085520] xend[1660]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  504.907064] __ratelimit: 205 callbacks suppressed
> [  504.907070] xend[2628]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  504.922303] xend[2631]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  504.937531] xend[2634]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  504.952277] xend[2638]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  504.966630] xend[2641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  504.981380] xend[2644]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  504.996759] xend[2647]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  505..012018] xend[2650]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  505.026693] xend[2653]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> [  505.041834] xend[2656]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
> 
> Boris.
> 
> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>> To: "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:38 AM
>> 
>> You can use any kernel as dom0 for Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel includes
>> dom0 support. So that could be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project, or
>> Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by default
>> by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but that doesn't
>> mean you *have* to use it.
>> 
>>  -- Keir
>> 
>> On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx
>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Keir, Xen Group ...
>>>  
>>> Just to make things more clear, I wanted to know which kernel version this
>>> version support?
>>> Is it still work with the old stable kernel 2.6.18 or should I grub the new
>>> version from Jeremy branches?
>>>  
>>> To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work by default with the
>>> pv_ops mechanism on the dom0.
>>> But at the moment the latest stable kernel 2.6.32.3 does not include a dom0
>>> support but only domU support (both oldstyle and pv_ops).
>>>  
>>> So, Does the release of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in the
>>> kernel
>>> mainline?
>>>  
>>> According to Jeremy there is quite more work to do in-order to have Xen Dom0
>>> support in the kernel mainline. see more here:
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/75992
>>> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen..devel/75992>
>>>  
>>> Can you please provide more feedback on this issue?
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing to the open source this
>>> amazing virtualization system.
>>> Sassy 
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>> 
>>>> The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and published.
>>>> 
>>>> You can grab it from here:
>>>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4.0.0-rc1')
>>>> 
>>>> Please test it!
>>>> 
>>>>  -- Keir
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
>  



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel