[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support

To: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:25:35 +0000
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Papagiannis Anastasios <apapag@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:29:24 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Ian Pratt wrote:

In the case where a VM is asking for more vCPUs there are pCPUs in a node we 
should contain the guest to multiple nodes. (I presume we favour nodes 
according to the number of vCPUs they already have committed to them?)

Seems like CPU load might be a better measure. Xen doesn't calculateload currently, but it's on my list of things to do.


 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
  - From: Ian Pratt

References:
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
  - From: Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
  - From: Andre Przywara
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
  - From: George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
  - From: Andre Przywara
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
  - From: Ian Pratt

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.