[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: Request for backport of 82599 quirks to 3.4.2

Rose, Gregory V writes ("Request for backport of 82599 quirks to 3.4.2"):
> commit a77dc89dde1b8b9331c0f746e34389d6a253755f
> Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Aug 4 15:28:14 2009 +0100
>     passthrough: support the assignment of the VF of Intel 82599 10GbE 
> Controlle

If I remember rightly this was a quirk of this particular card.  I'd
be quite fine with putting that in the 3.4.x branch.

Just so we are clear: these two backports both serve the same purpose
but as far as I can tell having either of them separately is no worse
than having neither ?  So there's no need to coordinate the change
across the trees ?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.