|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pt_msix_init: Error: Can't map physical MSI-X table: Invalid argument
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Stefano Stabellini
<stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Bruce Edge wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Stefano Stabellini
>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Cinco, Dante wrote:
>> >> I get the above error message when I boot the domU (Linux 2.6.30.1). I'm
>> >> using Xen 3.5-unstable (changeset 20303) with
>> >> pv_ops kernel 2.6.31.1. I use pci-stub to hide the device so that I can
>> >> assign/pass it through to domU. The error is
>> >> coming from ioemu-xxx/hw/pt-msi.c. I think it is complaining about the
>> >> table_off that is part of the mmap() call:
>> >>
>> >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16,
>> >> PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED,
>> >> fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off);
>> >>
>> >> When I printed table_off, its value is 0x4100 (not page-aligned) which is
>> >> consistent with the BAR4 offset of the PCI
>> >> device (see below). I think mmap() requires the last argument to be a
>> >> multiple of the page size and results is a map
>> >> error if it is not. Here's the partial output of "lspci -vv -s 0:07:0.1"
>> >> from dom0:
>> >>
>> >> 07:00.0 Fibre Channel: PMC-Sierra Inc. Device 8032 (rev 05)
>> >> Subsystem: Atto Technology Device 003c
>> >> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
>> >> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
>> >> Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+
>> >> Queue=0/1 Enable+
>> >> Address: 00000000fee11000 Data: 405e
>> >> Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01
>> >> DevCap: MaxPayload 4096 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
>> >> <4us, L1 unlimited
>> >> ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-
>> >> Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Mask- TabSize=9
>> >> Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00004100
>> >> PBA: BAR=4 offset=00004000
>> >>
>> >> I'm able to workaround this problem by modifying pt-msi.c: force offset
>> >> to zero in mmap() and on the next line, adjust
>> >> the pointer by table_off:
>> >>
>> >> table_off_adjust = table_off & 0x0fff;
>> >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16 +
>> >> table_off_adjust,
>> >> PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED,
>> >> fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off -
>> >> table_off_adjust);
>> >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = (void *)((char
>> >> *)dev->msix->phys_iomem_base + table_off_adjust);
>> >>
>> >> Ideally, I should only be applying this to my device but since I'm not
>> >> passing any other device that use MSI, I don't see
>> >> any negative effect. In addition, my device only uses MSI and not MSI-X.
>> >>
>> >> Obviously, this is a custom hack but I was wondering if there is a
>> >> cleaner solution for this. Is a non-page aligned BAR
>> >> offset unusual? When I boot Linux 2.6.30.1 on bare metal (no Xen), I
>> >> don't see this error.
>> >
>> > I think this workaround is not so bad, you just need to keep
>> > table_off_adjust around because it has to be used in munmap too.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Here's a patch that propagates the offset to the munmap as well. Any
>> chance this could be applied to the hg repository?
>>
>> -Bruce
>>
>> diff -Naur ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pt-msi.c.orig
>> ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pt-msi.c
>>
>> --- ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pt-msi.c.orig 2009-10-13
>> 11:54:11.000000000 -0700
>> +++ ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pt-msi.c 2009-10-14 15:16:31.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -535,6 +535,10 @@
>> DPCI_REMOVE_MAPPING);
>> }
>>
>> +/* Calculated offset to page-align MSI-X mmap
>> + * Needed for munmap as well */
>> +static int table_off_adjust = 0;
>> +
>> int pt_msix_init(struct pt_dev *dev, int pos)
>> {
>> uint8_t id;
>> @@ -542,6 +546,7 @@
>> int i, total_entries, table_off, bar_index;
>> struct pci_dev *pd = dev->pci_dev;
>> int fd;
>> + int err;
>>
>> id = pci_read_byte(pd, pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID);
>>
>> @@ -584,9 +589,14 @@
>> PT_LOG("Error: Can't open /dev/mem: %s\n", strerror(errno));
>> goto error_out;
>> }
>> - dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16,
>> + PT_LOG("table_off = %llx, total_entries =
>> %d\n",table_off,total_entries);
>> + table_off_adjust = table_off & 0x0fff;
>> + dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16 +
>> table_off_adjust,
>> PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED,
>> - fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off);
>> + fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off -
>> table_off_adjust);
>> + dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = (void *)((char
>> *)dev->msix->phys_iomem_base + table_off_adjust);
>> + err = errno;
>> + PT_LOG("errno = %d\n",err);
>> if ( dev->msix->phys_iomem_base == MAP_FAILED )
>> {
>> PT_LOG("Error: Can't map physical MSI-X table: %s\n",
>> strerror(errno));
>> @@ -612,7 +622,7 @@
>> {
>> PT_LOG("unmapping physical MSI-X table from %lx\n",
>> (unsigned long)dev->msix->phys_iomem_base);
>> - munmap(dev->msix->phys_iomem_base, dev->msix->total_entries * 16);
>> + munmap(dev->msix->phys_iomem_base, dev->msix->total_entries *
>> 16 + table_off_adjust);
>> }
>>
>> free(dev->msix);
>>
>
> I think this is fine apart from the fact that table_off_adjust should be
> stored as another field in dev->msix, that is "struct pt_msix_info" in
> hw/pass-through.h.
>
> Any other comments, Keir, Ian?
>
Here it is again with the suggested changes.
-Bruce
--- ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pass-through.h.orig 2009-10-15
10:22:17.000000000 -0700
+++ ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pass-through.h 2009-10-15
11:08:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@
int mmio_index;
void *phys_iomem_base;
struct msix_entry_info msix_entry[0];
+ uint32_t table_offset_adjust; /* page align mmap */
};
struct pt_pm_info {
--- ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pt-msi.c.orig 2009-10-13
11:54:11.000000000 -0700
+++ ./tools/ioemu-remote/hw/pt-msi.c 2009-10-15 10:29:50.000000000 -0700
@@ -542,6 +542,7 @@
int i, total_entries, table_off, bar_index;
struct pci_dev *pd = dev->pci_dev;
int fd;
+ int err;
id = pci_read_byte(pd, pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID);
@@ -584,9 +585,15 @@
PT_LOG("Error: Can't open /dev/mem: %s\n", strerror(errno));
goto error_out;
}
- dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16,
+ PT_LOG("table_off = %llx, total_entries = %d\n",table_off,total_entries);
+ dev->msix->table_offset_adjust = table_off & 0x0fff;
+ dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16 +
dev->msix->table_offset_adjust,
PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED,
- fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off);
+ fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off -
dev->msix->table_offset_adjust);
+ dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = (void *)((char *)dev->msix->phys_iomem_base +
+ dev->msix->table_offset_adjust);
+ err = errno;
+ PT_LOG("errno = %d\n",err);
if ( dev->msix->phys_iomem_base == MAP_FAILED )
{
PT_LOG("Error: Can't map physical MSI-X table: %s\n", strerror(errno));
@@ -612,7 +619,8 @@
{
PT_LOG("unmapping physical MSI-X table from %lx\n",
(unsigned long)dev->msix->phys_iomem_base);
- munmap(dev->msix->phys_iomem_base, dev->msix->total_entries * 16);
+ munmap(dev->msix->phys_iomem_base, dev->msix->total_entries * 16 +
+ dev->msix->table_offset_adjust);
}
free(dev->msix);
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |