[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 12] backport critical fixes from qemu upstream

  • To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Mark Johnson <johnson.nh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:55 -0400
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:50:21 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lxg899y0Er4yPQ5/WgqdXejWYoPScnDwHTHxA83NPG5SM+by94Std1gPiP9H6HzWyi B7R3e9KnhXb72xJMcWqZ91E11ewhcY4MDu6n5kELltjOTI9gfFhIc5umv6lw4U3OL+0X jjdo11ea0Nmzo4DQtjI9dfmpGt3bMlhVn8r+k=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mark Johnson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 12] backport critical fixes 
> from qemu upstream"):
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Stefano Stabellini
>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The same should be done to qemu-xen-3.4-testing as well.
>> > Cheers,
>> Are you planning to push these to qemu-xen-3.4-testing  soon too?
> Yes, but I'm giving it a few days to settle down in qemu-xen-unstable
> first, as that seemed sensible ...

FYI, I've pull these changes into 3.4 and qemu-dm is still leaking
a ton of memory for HVM guests which do not have PV drivers..

qemu-dm does not appear to leak memory for a HVM guest with
PV net & disk drivers.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.