[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] stubdomain conf error


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Giorgenes Gelatti <giorgenes@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:34:40 -0300
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:35:25 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NT5QI4gyq2FKX+ERqK0uZhwVhyAR7C+MjiMMg6PeARVrOaNynXSWY8/PAUXf1UwV+Y XynSZ5Lyc3lowd6xUJ6XqL26J88BWDMENvYl/oM3uNaBFYkbNlJBIhYm79xvjUSByO6M iLXJtETgxRN+Trxn6Qy5158KTfZR3kKLJIHns=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

#xen-3.4.0> cat .hg_archival.txt
repo: ab039beb22dc9d53f224a5ef2ef88d534b561898
node: d2a5c477c647dc7b3f51a761ab481ed80d5a1771


2009/7/10 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
> To which version should I apply the patch?
> My version (3.4) doesn't have the lines in the patch.
> I tryed adding the lines to the stubdom-dm but it didn't work.

Uhm.. I couldn't reproduce the issue on 3.4 testing.
If you are using 3.4, which CS is the tip of you xen and qemu trees?

> Should I get the "unstable" version?

The "unstable" version works for me at the moment, you can give it a
try.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.