[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] Xen dom0 Kernel Patches


  • To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:56:17 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tVMYtC5QFLrkQRFL5z02FHtNn3kVjf2wljiMrJRqaJMvMP0M5GGn+274MWYjAo+ml03REpLdVwsU/scxG1JESH3EqvNgXIbmkJzn1+Yg/RurngspbFq6mP4yK/SKhkwRwWeeaUv/QIVDJZZ4kRHMj9jX3JTjzNnD53sq/7s+UHY=;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Through my experience xenified kernel been built on
   # hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6.27-xen.hg
works  fine under Xen 3.3.1,3.4,3.5-unstable.
However, attempt to shutdown Xen Host causes dropping into stack trace.
Kernel 2.6.29.4 with rebased patches suggested by Andy Lyon allows to
shutdown Xen Host cleanly.

Boris.

--- On Thu, 6/4/09, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen dom0 Kernel Patches
To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>, "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, June 4, 2009, 11:08 AM

> Are you willing to maintain such patchsets? The temporary 2.6.27-xen tree
> made for Novell/SuSE guys is totally unmaintained..

The 2.6.27 git tree and patchqueue under the Xen Client Initiative directory on xenbits is fairly well maintained: http://xenbits.xen.org/XCI/

To my mind this would be a better default tree for us to use for xen-unstable than the ancient 2.6.18. We obviously want to continue to encourage folk to try Jeremy's pvops dom0 stable tree based off the latest linux release too.

Ian


> I think most of the development effort should be used on getting pv_ops
> dom0 ready for
> mainline, but if you (for example), want to maintain forward-ported patches
> for new kernel versions, it sounds like a good idea.. for the time being.
>
> -- Pasi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.