[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:15:53 -0700
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:16:30 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcnZS5At0yNWRsEtRNCkR/Y0ePrO/wAAYnnf
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array

On 20/05/2009 06:04, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Cloning the similar construct from Linux, allowing to detect improper
> uses of ARRAY_SIZE() at build time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

Would simply removing the cast to void from BUILD_BUG_ON() lead to compiler
warnings?

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array
  - From: Jan Beulich

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Network drop to domU (netfront: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295)
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: eliminate hard-coded NR_IRQS
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.