[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg / crash with 2.6.30-rc3 pv_ops dom0



On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:05:13PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 15:38 -0400, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > [root@dom0test linux-2.6-xen]# gdb vmlinux
> > (gdb) x/i 0xc0888d74
> > 0xc0888d74 <__constant_c_memset+21>:    rep stos %eax,%es:(%edi)
> 
> I see basically the same thing, except I'm testing current xen-tip/next,
> 

Good to hear it's not only me :)

I also saw similar crash on xen-tip/next.

-- Pasi

> (XEN) d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0003)
> (XEN) Pagetable walk from 00000000c0e5d000:
> (XEN)  L4[0x000] = 000000011b537027 0000000000000537
> (XEN)  L3[0x003] = 000000011b5b9027 00000000000005b9
> (XEN)  L2[0x007] = 000000011be64067 0000000000000e64 
> (XEN)  L1[0x05d] = 000000011be5d001 0000000000000e5d
> (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S
> (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
> (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.4-unstable  x86_64  debug=y  Not tainted ]----
> (XEN) CPU:    0
> (XEN) RIP:    e019:[<00000000c056bd2f>]
> (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000287   EM: 1   CONTEXT: pv guest
> (XEN) rax: 0000000000000000   rbx: 0000000000000000   rcx: 0000000000000400
> (XEN) rdx: 00000000c0e5d000   rsi: 0000000000000000   rdi: 00000000c0e5d000
> (XEN) rbp: 00000000c0555d84   rsp: 00000000c0555d68   r8:  0000000000000000
> (XEN) r9:  0000000000000000   r10: 0000000000000000   r11: 0000000000000000
> (XEN) r12: 0000000000000000   r13: 0000000000000000   r14: 0000000000000000
> (XEN) r15: 0000000000000000   cr0: 000000008005003b   cr4: 00000000000006f0
> (XEN) cr3: 000000011ffb0000   cr2: 00000000c0e5d000
> (XEN) ds: e021   es: e021   fs: e021   gs: e021   ss: e021   cs: e019
> 
> (gdb) disas 0x00000000c056bd2f
> [...]
> 0xc056bd2f <alloc_low_page+47>:       rep stos %eax,%es:(%edi)
> 
> The rough stack trace seems to be (unabridged version below):
>         c056bd2f: alloc_low_page + 47 in section .init.text
>         c056bda8: one_page_table_init + 88 in section .init.text
>         c056cddb: kernel_physical_mapping_init + 571 in
>         section .init.text
>         c03dae40: init_memory_mapping + 800 in section .text
>         c055f656: setup_arch + 1014 in section .init.text
>         c055a7b6: start_kernel + 118 in section .init.text
>         c055a076: i386_start_kernel + 86 in section .init.text
>         c055d1cb: xen_start_kernel + 955 in section .init.text
> 
> I thought
>         commit 4c76c04421dfe7be3e5a1d8ab1b2a3be0b02558e
>         Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>         Date:   Fri Mar 6 16:49:00 2009 -0800
>         
>             x86: introduce bootmem_state
> might be at fault but reverting doesn't improve matters. There's some
> other cleanup/unification patches in the recent-ish history of init_32.c
> which might be worth investigating further.
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.