[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops parport trouble


  • To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:51:03 +0000
  • Cc: Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:51:39 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcmSrnhN1iw2Pz99SKWQUuNX2E0MdAAA8eOq
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops parport trouble

On 19/02/2009 16:23, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Yes, that looks completely backwards. Could pv_ops dom0 be getting the
>> trigger flag in IO-APIC redir entries inverted somehow?
>>   
> 
> I guess that's possible, but the code in question does just pass the
> trigger and polarity straight through.  What does it say about the
> trigger and polarity for those interrupts in the dmesg output?
> 
> I guess it would explain quite a few of the "lost interrupt" symptoms
> we've been seeing, but I'm surprised things work at all well if they
> really are reversed.

Comparing with a non-pv_ops dom0 on that same system would be an obvious
next step.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.