[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] irq_guest_eoi_timer interaction with MSI


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:38:49 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:39:12 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AclO4Z533R8QobrUEd2bbAAWy6hiGQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] irq_guest_eoi_timer interaction with MSI

On 25/11/08 08:52, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 25.11.08 09:44 >>>
>> ... And lack of 64-bit capability is the only reason not to run 64-bit Xen
>> these days.
> 
> Is it, really? That is, are all the save/restore/migrate issues indeed fixed?
> I
> didn't think so, but then again I don't follow closely what happens on the
> tools side...

That's a dom0 vs domU issue. You can run 32-bit dom0 on 64-bit Xen, and that
suffices to avoid Xen's address-space constraints.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.