[Xen-devel] Re: Xen spinlock questions

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > 2) While on native not re-enabling interrupts in __raw_spin_lock_flags()
> > > may be tolerable (but perhaps questionable), not doing so at least on
> > > the slow path here seems suspicious.
> > >   
> > >       
> > I wasn't sure about that.  Is it OK to enable interrupts in the middle 
> > of a spinlock?  Can it be done unconditionally?
> >     
> That used to be done in the pre-ticket lock implementation, but of course
> conditional upon the original interrupt flag.
>   
Right, I see.  The spin_lock_flags stuff which the current lock 
implementation just ignores.  I'll add a new lock op for it.
> Later yesterday I noticed another issue: The code setting lock_spinners
> isn't interruption safe - you'll need to return the old value from
> spinning_lock() and restore it in unspinning_lock().
>   
Good catch.

> Also I'm considering doing it ticket-based nevertheless, as "mix(ing) up
> next cpu selection" won't really help fairness in xen_spin_unlock_slow().
>   
Why's that?  An alternative might be to just wake all cpus waiting for 
the lock up, and then let them fight it out.  It should be unusual that 
there's a significant number of waiters anyway, since contention is 
(should be) rare.
The main reason for ticket locks is to break the egregious unfairness 
that (some) bus protocols implement.  That level of fairness shouldn't 
be necessary here because once the cpus fall to blocking in the 
hypervisor, it's up to Xen to tie-break.
> Apart from definitely needing the wakeup to happen for just the target
> CPU (Keir, I'd want the necessary support in Xen done for that to work
> regardless of performance measurements with the traditional locking,
> as it's known that with ticket locks performance suffers from wrong-
> order CPU kicking), one thing we'd be in even more need for here than
> old-style spin locks had been would be a directed yield (sub-)hypercall.
> Has that ever been considered to become a schedop?
>   
Considered.  But the point of this exercise was to come up with 
something that would work with an unmodified hypervisor.
   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel