[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3 --- Revised and resent


  • To: "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:48:18 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 23 May 2008 03:48:59 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Aci6Rwan30LCwMVNRjCgsXSrb2rzYwAOb9TQAAFWQHAAAIxGwAAAHx6dAACz6YAAAGA27AAfNwegAG4iWxM=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3 --- Revised and resent

I think all these issues are fixed as of c/s 17713. However, when I s3resume
a Linux guest I find it is unresponsive and the VGA display is corrupted by
re-printing of BIOS start-of-day messages. Perhaps the BIOS is taking an
incorrect path on S3 resume? It would be good if you can look into this now
-- I think the hypervisor issues at least are now resolved and this is
probably something in the higher-level rombios or ioemu logic.

 -- Keir

On 21/5/08 07:31, "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, Keir
> We have some test today, found several small points:
> 1. after cpu_reset, seems we need to call vcpu_initialise to reconstruct vmcs,
> otherwise, the domain could not be resumed back and xen has low response then.
> 2. yes, we may need to find a way to clear that io_port_write, otherwise, save
> will hang. I add back the clear (defer_shutdown =0) to have a test, then it
> works just fine.
> 3. in python, seems it will report
>     a. global name "TRIGGER_S3RESUME" is not defined
>     b. global name "HVM_PARAM_ACPI_S_STATE" is not defined
> 
> After solve those problems, I found it could work fine, even with PV drivers
> installed. I found vif is ok after resume back.
> Will you help us to solve them or need do it by us?
> 
> Thanks a lot for your help!
> Criping
> 
> 
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 20/5/08 16:19, "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> OK. Another thing is that
>>> when debugging, we found when s3_sleep, it will generate the
>>> acpi_ioport write operation, it is not cleared so v->defer_shutdown
>>> is set when s3_suspend. Then it will prevent save process to do
>>> domain_shutdown, save process will hang. So we clear defer_shutdown
>>> flag for each vcpu when do s3_suspend.
>>> 
>>> After refactory since we did not clear the flag, I am not sure
>>> whether this problem will exist. I will have a try tomorrow.
>> 
>> Oh yes, I forgot I removed that. It looked a bit aggressive, so if the
>> problem remains then perhaps we can find a nicer way round the
>> problem. 
>> 
>>  -- Keir
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.