[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow direct hypercalls

To: john.levon@xxxxxxx
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 16:16:33 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 May 2008 08:58:56 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 05:56 -0700, john.levon@xxxxxxx wrote:
> For PV guests, there's no reason to force use of the indirect hypercall
> mechanism. Allow it.

It was originally intended to provide some flexibility to the hypervisor
in how hypercalls were performed, encouraging new guests to use it seems
rather counter to this -- why do you want to use them?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow direct hypercalls
  - From: John Levon

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow direct hypercalls
  - From: john . levon

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] New Email Account for Security
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Why is STP turned off?
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow direct hypercalls
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow direct hypercalls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.