Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time()

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

So does the below indicate that 92529 of your HPET accesses took between 0
and 63 cycles? That seems rather short for an access off-chip and to the
southbridge.

 -- Keir

On 28/4/08 19:40, "Dave Winchell" <dwinchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> read_64_main_counter() On stime:
> 
> (VMM)  cycles per bucket 64
> (VMM)
> (VMM)  0: 0 78795 148271 21173 15902 47704 89195 121962
> (VMM)  8: 83632 51848 17531 12987 10976 8816 9120 8608
> (VMM)  16: 5685 3972 3783 2518 1052 710 608 469
> (VMM)  24: 277 159 83 46 34 23 19 16
> (VMM)  32: 9 6 7 3 4 8 5 6
> (VMM)  40: 9 7 14 13 17 25 22 29
> (VMM)  48: 25 19 35 27 30 26 21 23
> (VMM)  56: 17 24 12 27 22 18 10 22
> (VMM)  64: 19 16 16 16 28 18 23 16
> (VMM)  72: 22 22 12 14 21 19 17 19
> (VMM)  80: 18 14 10 14 11 12 8 18
> (VMM)  88: 16 10 17 14 10 8 11 11
> (VMM)  96: 10 10 0 175
> 
> read_64_main_counter() Going to the hardware:
> 
> (VMM)  cycles per bucket 64
> (VMM)
> (VMM)  0: 92529 148423 27850 12532 28042 43336 60516 59011
> (VMM)  8: 36895 14043 8162 6857 7794 7401 5099 2986
> (VMM)  16: 1636 1066 796 592 459 409 314 248
> (VMM)  24: 206 195 138 97 71 45 35 34
> (VMM)  32: 33 36 40 40 25 26 25 26
> (VMM)  40: 37 23 18 30 27 30 34 44
> (VMM)  48: 38 19 25 23 23 25 21 27
> (VMM)  56: 28 24 43 80 220 324 568 599
> (VMM)  64: 610 565 611 699 690 846 874 788
> (VMM)  72: 703 542 556 613 605 603 559 500
> (VMM)  80: 485 493 512 578 561 594 575 614
> (VMM)  88: 759 851 895 856 807 770 719 958
> (VMM)  96: 1127 1263 0 18219
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel