Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] query on physical memory map for Xen?

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: "pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:18:12 +0530

Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:48:35 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YhT3jyFPSeA5L6p9EGoD2NjPTuQk+JUUrLYEdnjifFSdE/4ECb1VmnV77wS+vaQ4zpn7LI3yPxR7CdkidT2DhWv8m5MjpPvqmP3YvuJ1fYF7pglv9mBTDt2tCJujlq1yb9W18vdJ/Xj2QlCQlGgVe1gMP3y+pIhn0x1guMAbLko=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Ok. Thanks for your time Keir. --Pradeep On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/4/08 08:13, "pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> 32-bit Xen does not use memory above 16GB at all. 64-bit Xen can use any > >> amount of memory, and is able to keep a permanent mapping of all of it. > > > > Thanks for the reply Keir. > > Is that a deliberate feature or a limitation of Xen hypervisor? > > It's a limitation due to the way that 32-bit Xen handles memory management. > We don't intend to lift the restriction since users are better off moving to > 64-bit Xen. > > -- Keir > > > -- Pradeep Singh Rautela http://eagain.wordpress.com http://emptydomain.googlepages.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.