Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xsm: Consolidate xsm processing within domain control hypercall.

["George S. Coker, II" <gscoker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/4/07 5:05 PM, "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 16:49 -0500, Mike D. Day wrote:
>> On 04/12/07 13:06 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> 
>>>   Does this work right across a PV domain save/restore on x86?  On ia64
>>> I end up with "Domain-Unnamed" after I save a PV domain and another
>>> after I restore it, then do a shutdown.  Reverting this patch restores
>>> correct behavior.  Thanks,
>> 
>> I'll investigate this regression. Do you have any ideas as to why this
>> is happening?
> 
>    Nope, that's why I'm hoping x86 does something similar ;^)  Since I'm
> not using XSM_ENABLE, xsm_call should just be (0), which means the
> changed code should all be noops... but apparently something changes.
> BTW, xsm_call(domctl(domctl)) seems unnecessarily obfuscated.  Thanks,
> 

It does build on x86, but I'm confident it will rollover on boot.

> Alex

-- 
George S. Coker, II <gscoker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel