[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Xeno Linux never pins L1 tables ?


  • To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Satya <satyakiran@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:44:24 -0500
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:45:02 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=M2wcCDFnDOLjlPU9GzeeR4A+KsPQE2VLNmJ+/bV6v2T50e8V69g+TbpaD8k7AV/MBnEaTxElILy6pv/9H8v1YZ7Ct02oiowg01vlJaRbMSbMrBBHqP4cRL3dcZEzIo4QvwZwVKnLZsbHFvbKUzi8EVFpild5Vmth1K3HlxmdZXU=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

hi,
I'm developing my own 32-bit (no PAE) paravirtualized kernel for xen with Mini-OS as a starting point. I am currently working on process page table support (equivalent of arch/i386/mm/pgtable-xen.c) and mostly following Linux for the moment. I noticed that linux-2.6.18-xen never pins an L1 table (a pte), yet __pgd_pin() walks the page directory and gives up write access on the kernel mappings of pte pages and only pins the pgd page. How do set_pte() and set_pte_at() macros work if they are writing directly to the page table entires ? do we fault in the kernel to handle this ?!

thanks,
satya.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.