Re: [Xen-devel] credit scheduler and HYPERVISOR_yield()

[Emmanuel Ackaouy <ackaouy@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi John.

The expected behavior of yield() (or any schedule operation really) is
that the current VCPU will be placed on the runq behind all VCPUs of
equal or greater priority.

Looking at __runq_insert() in sched_credit.c, it looks correct to me in
that respect.

Can you clarify what's going wrong?

On Oct 9, 2007, at 1:41, John Levon wrote:

> It looks like a HYPERVISOR_yield() call will end placing the yielded
> VCPU at the head of run queue if there are only equal-or-lower priority
> VCPUs on the queue. Shouldn't it place it after any equal-priority CPUs
> on the list?
>
> thanks
> john
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel