[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] XENPF_ numbering?


  • To: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:53:17 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:51:08 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcfQVXu7ugA+JDxIEdyOVAAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] XENPF_ numbering?

The old dom0_op() API maps onto the platform_op, so any platform_ops that
were previously dom0_ops had to keep their old dom0_op-era numbers.

 -- Keir

On 27/7/07 14:17, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> I'm sure it's something obvious, but why are there big gaps in XENPF_*
> numbering?
> 
> thanks
> john
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.