[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] crashkernel allocation failure #2


  • To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:26:11 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:24:11 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Ace3Vk4tjKkGYiNJEdys9QAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [patch] crashkernel allocation failure #2

On 22/6/07 10:46, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A side effect of the second change is that you can specify just
> "crashkernel=64m" and have it moved to the right place just above the
> xen heap automagically.

Does this really work in practice (i.e., is the crashkernel relocatable)?

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.