Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Clean up and fix errors in strncpy -> strlcpy conversion

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 30/1/07 08:23, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> In my patch, safe_strcpy() is gone. And anyway, if safe_strcpy works as
> expected, then apart from the return value there's no difference to
> strlcpy().

I kept safe_strcpy() now implemented over strlcpy() and returns non-zero if
the result is truncated. When writing into a char array this is less
redundant than writing (strlcpy(d,s,sizeof(d) >= sizeof(d)) where 'd' is
often some annoyingly long structural name.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel