[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag)

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:44:41 +0100
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:48:06 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Friday 22 December 2006 10:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I object to the change to variable_test_bit() - why is that needed? I had
> specifically submitted a patch to get the const qualifier added there. Jan

The ADDR macro discards the const again.
I attached an alternative patch.

Attachment: xen-cast-xen.diff
Description: Text Data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag)
  - From: Christoph Egger
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag)
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag)
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Problem of netfront by network-attach/detach
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag)
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] Problem of netfront by network-attach/detach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.