[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] demo cd 3.0.3 on non-pae machine


  • To: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
  • From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:12:33 -0700
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Adriaan Peeters <apeeters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:13:40 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lx1IaXazi5QaYaqU88var89czL/lWLHKTJM3HiyUJWil+/XCioJAM2BjPrSQDBKbV3LmHdOqOmrq8Wuw1Ep7CJ9DCgR/I9s1kKJaNrgDh6jrruM1OXJaM9ZW6HFXec6TNQgT7G9RsAOwJiHiKBeuOEoxzRIFqbFB8HoVFosHKwc=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 12/1/06, Petersson, Mats <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:

What CPU do you have that doesn't support PAE? AMD has had PAE since K6
or K5 days, Intel had it before then...


How about "What OS do you have that does not support PAE?". A
different question, with a different answer. And, I have such an OS,
and, it would not boot under the Xen RPMs.

I am finding, however, that the best way to run Xen is to skip the
tarballs, RPMs, etc. and just hg the source tree and build from
scratch. That solved all my FC4 problems.

But I don't think the attitude of "we know best what you want" is
really very helpful, especially since it is not correct.

ron

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.