[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] hypercall interface libraries and the GPL


  • To: "Andrew D. Ball" <aball@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:23:59 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:27:42 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Aca2EX2KSNAEWZPBS5isAsOcnHyUHQL9EUMw
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] hypercall interface libraries and the GPL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew D. Ball
> Sent: 01 August 2006 20:04
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] hypercall interface libraries and the GPL
> 
> Good afternoon.
> 
> libxenctrl and libxenguest are GPL, right?

Yes.

> One can probably make hypercalls without them.  Even so, if they are
> GPL, why?  Why not LGPL or something else, at least for some parts of
> them.

I can certainly see an argument for them being LGPL.

Running some searches on the changelog, it looks like it mightn't be too
difficult to get agreement from all the contributors to relicense
tools/libxc. The number of people and organizations that have submitted
non-trivial patches to those files is just about manageable.

I assume no one has objections to this?

Thanks,
Ian




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.