Re: [Xen-devel] omission in x86-64's entry-xen.S ?

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/8/06 8:34 am, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> following sysret_signal there is a 'cli' left, but the hypervisor doesn't even
> emulate this anymore as equivalent of
> clearing evtchn_upcall_mask - I'm fairly certain XEN_BLOCK_EVENTS() is meant
> here, otherwise a comment should explain
> why this needs to keep the native instruction.

Any stupidities you see in x86/64 entry-xen.S almost certainly really are
bugs. Please send a patch!

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel