[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] how can native driver response quickly for low FIFO device


  • To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 22:59:25 +0800
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:00:13 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcaAClDvXuiJ5TPlSEOVp+zmLqYdLQAALGfg
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] how can native driver response quickly for low FIFO device

Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, at 15:21, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> 
>> Oo, understand UART is handled by Xen, Is this because of this
>> reason? or for debug/console use, and how about other devices?
>> If a user has an PCI card with 8 UART in the box, will we have
>> problem? thx,eddie
> 
> Oh, now I see your point. Yes, for any serial device not handled by
> Xen you could have a scheduling problem. Other examples include
> telephony interface cards and their drivers (e.g., zaptel).
> Higher-rate UARTs do tend to support bigger FIFOs in hardware though.
> Best bet if it really matters is to dedicate a logical processor to
> the domain that owns the hardware.
> 
Yes :-)
 Fortunately most devices in modern computer has either big FIFO or DMA
support.
Those kind of low FIFO device will be headache in VM environment.
Dedicated LP is a good choice, further more HT can take the advantage
here :-)
Eddie

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.