[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Slow guest network I/O when CPU is pegged - Looking for acknowledgement from developers


  • To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Anand Gupta" <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:44:02 +0530
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:14:22 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=seCXo/r6SZ9DQB1Ap09rMKYyGgq5ySBwnNTHXdtcv37xtRLvtPatod3gT5MOlrKY31AsMzuOYyoDBzLzWluqq454HVkYzii0RLafR6vGkOHLq/f3Kbt+mJMgDBQC0DiZecIKnJuiEh7RF8AvMA3s5hNUVrHM+DzMCFFGHKHW3ho=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 4/19/06, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
Are there any downsides in using BVT scheduler in Xen 3.0 ? Why was the
default changed from BVT -> SEDF ?

I would like to know that as well. What i have seen from the mailing lists, SEDF is the most talked about and recommended one...

--
regards,

Anand Gupta
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.