Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xm: cleanup sched-sedf and tests

[Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

* Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-03-13 09:54]:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:36:48AM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote:
> 
> > I'll be sure to use hg export.  I thought that inline was preferred rather
> > than attachment so that the patch is readable directly in the mail client.
> > Ideally, the patch shouldn't word-wrap.  I can make them attachments if
> > that is the preferred method.
> 
> I've heard people say that they prefer inline, but for me, an attachment is by
> far the best option.  My client (mutt) can show attachments inline anyway, so
> reading the patch is not a problem, but cut-and-pasting from the terminal
> certainly can be.

Agreed.  Now if we can fix the mail clients that send patches as
application/octet-stream with don't get auto-inlined.  =)

> Patches do have a tendency to word-wrap.  Many developers work right up to the
> 80th column, which means that by the time you add the two characters on the
> left for the diff indicators, you're going to wrap.  Furthermore, the headers
> on the diff often include a full path name and a date, and they wrap most of
> the time.

Yep.

> If you want to cover all bases, you can attach it _and_ paste it inline, but
> I'd be happy just with the attachment.  There are a few conscientious people
> who do that, but I don't want to put too much burden on those people doing
> good work for Xen, and I certainly wouldn't insist upon it!

OK.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel