[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] A question about CONFIG_SMP

  • To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:51:23 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:52:18 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcY4VlGd0Z3jeC1aTwy18Jvxcoih5A==
  • Thread-topic: A question about CONFIG_SMP

Just a curious question, does anyone still care xen/UP? If yes, current
failed to build quickly after undef CONFIG_SMP since many structures
include types 
defined only when CONFIG_SMP is on.

Just realize this issue when cleanup some IA64 code recently, where
CONFIG_SMP is still unstable and thus UP only.

Is there any benefit to have xen/UP? Reducing image size is the
immediate answer in my head...


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.