Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> 14.02.06 19:25:19 >>>
>xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/14/2006 11:37:45 AM:
>
>> While there has been a new (conditionalized) call to 
>> del_singleshot_timer_sync() added, the old instance hasn't been
>> deleted (other than the parallel atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 
>> 0)). Is this intentional? If so, how is this supposed
>> to work?
>
>This has most likely been introduced during the recent merging with newer 
>kernel trees.

But this doesn't tell me if the current code is correct or has to be regarded 
broken (as I suspect)...

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel