[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question

>>> Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> 14.02.06 19:25:19 >>>
>xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/14/2006 11:37:45 AM:
>> While there has been a new (conditionalized) call to 
>> del_singleshot_timer_sync() added, the old instance hasn't been
>> deleted (other than the parallel atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 
>> 0)). Is this intentional? If so, how is this supposed
>> to work?
>This has most likely been introduced during the recent merging with newer 
>kernel trees.

But this doesn't tell me if the current code is correct or has to be regarded 
broken (as I suspect)...


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.