[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] No network device problem in -testing

  • To: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:54:20 +0100
  • Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:06:14 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jIub3ZvKoTsi629GXt1vZFCDCgJ0eQuB7m16wdAggKgkCMbNzdwTIxVRl0Fur7DuyngQyaotmKTgykqXiB2bqYps6pTmwgRHv/47W3YRXesZI5lIAx2B8lDhDIClL0meLMUGRMc6bVl+KDrjRavUtErKAQf1Gb5xMdfjLXeA2Bk=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Ewan Mellor wrote:
> This change was made on Dec 13.  Previously, the nics= option and the
> vif option interacted in unexpected ways (nics=0 did not necessarily
> mean 0 vifs, for example).  This way vif and vbd configuration behaves
> the same, and there are no concealed defaults to confuse people.

It seems that the options:

still work, but now they can also be specified within the vif=['']
list as vif=['ip=blah, etc'].

Is this a bug, or is there just supposed to be two ways to apply an IP
address etc. now?

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.