Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:58 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> IP> Well, one thing we will need to watchout for is checkins to
> IP> xm-test that add tests that currently fail.
> 
> Do you mean tests that exercise things that we know don't work at the
> moment?  Would it be sufficient to make sure that those tests are
> marked as XFAIL?
> 
> I'm very glad to hear about the automated testing-before-pushing
> plans.  It sounds great!

I second that :-)

Regards,
Ted




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel