[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] supporting non-NX/XD capable processors on x86_64 xenlinux


  • To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jerone Young <jerone@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:43:32 -0500
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:41:44 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NxGqSR1CXJ/2fuqTCDlHsozymS8OtdCO/KdMEGJLwAE/EmIGTaCoyfWeZdaq6WBe9mvMvH8dDPBbKkTR3krrE3ExZ/d8sQgHLSmltBorveYNEbTjhu+qZODknTJdEnUT4wmeSxBn60cxkRadquszrMEx6b11xpl7CJgvAl/Kjqw=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

This is identical to the patch Scott Parish sent awhile back. Jun you
said that this was not a good way of going about fixing this (actually
it was kind of toward another problem ...but I think we were also
trying to get x86-64 xen to just boot at the time). I guess this is
the best way then?

On 8/17/05, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I remember some people complained that x86_64 xenlinux failed to boot on
> the systems with processor(s) that does not NX/XD. The patch should fix
> the problem as far as I tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.