[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] fix broken ACM


  • To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:19:58 +0900
  • Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:18:56 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hW0jqoyii/AfUfect2XSq+cF2m6u9x8E0K2bvH3qo0OihoYQtmRG+so54lMDhy9De1voW0IJsoA1jUrG/uh/ICwvSn27ghadSbVXC5y7kd8XGMHCjRIYvhHpjHy2gJp6rv+cYAKCWtmi6Q31tAXVdSXtam5aKSzmcQLe8AXNRW0=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 6/23/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 23 Jun 2005, at 09:04, aq wrote:
> 
> > i see, but the problem occurs if we want to compile it. the reason is
> > because you grouped null ops together, but you accidentally hide some
> > structures and variables. also we must enclose the declare of
> > acm_init() in #if (ACM_USE_SECURITY_POLICY = ACM_NULL_POLICY).  please
> > see my second patch.
> 
> If we build non-NULL security policy then the struct definitions and so
> on are compiled in, because they are in the else clause of the acm
> header file.

yes, that is true. but the default policy is NULL, and we get the
problem compiling the code at the moment. my patch does nothing, just
tries to fix the compiling problem (in default state).

regards,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.