[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Parallax or LVM?


  • To: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Andrew Warfield <andrew.warfield@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:16:04 +0100
  • Cc: Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:15:18 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jq/Q00i/ZWIoFlhG8ys0J/NQFczJMBFKE87obXodYJqjgWarB1Px3AS6T8Uv8mg8GliHeEcigT55fkewoCo5S8X5kQHczOXRsLKFF/V/tur0tVw5Ayi/iYnV+hP7bQ0dj7VXfgSr3gpR8yMTsOi8IeZ5NDpyhKPBYLvd8NaskYo=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hi aq,

   the parallax code is in unstable and does do cow.  It's been
undergoing a bunch of rewrites over the past month and will likely
continue to be unstable for the immediate future.  If you want to play
with it, there is a readme in the /tools/blktap directory that should
be fairly accurate, and I'm happy to track down any bugs that you turn
up.  That said, if you can wait until the end of the week, I'll be
checking in a few fixes that should make it a bit more pleasant to
work with. ;)

a.

On 6/8/05, aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hello,
> 
> Parallax is in -unstable short time ago. So in the future we can do
> CoW using it, provided it is stable enough. Should I still use LVM?
> 
> regards,
> aq
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.