[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]vbd/vnif paravirtulization driver hypervisorsupport]


  • To: "Ling, Xiaofeng" <xiaofeng.ling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:33:25 +0900
  • Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 25 May 2005 03:32:47 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ofCRSLMAbkADhxaNYNXPxz7wCvbKk7sz3ximR6FCZlKNxkM4OeaJSVcSetfiN/6AeQyvh94NwVaETgMLQ0b5TS+Wy17OgBW2+Tps2fdzSzeiEp/HJKgDe9Mvs2hpOsWKt7L7E4h3MPMpFUFBShya0QTegML/Hs94bS2H8/hFQvA=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 5/25/05, Ling, Xiaofeng <xiaofeng.ling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there any comment for this patch?
> Is it acceptable or not?

yes, i have the same question. sometimes patches sent to the list
receive no comment. that means they are in queu for review, and get
feedbacks later? or we should re-send the patches to the list (as in
LKML) ?

i think the policy of accepting patches should be made clear, and put
into the FAQ. that would be appreciated by contributors.

thank you,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.