Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen/ia64 presentation

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 27 Apr 2005, at 20:31, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

> Sounds good to me.
>
> On this subject, I'd also like to ask about full_execution_context_t.
> execution_context_t is used in a fair number of places in the Xen core;
> however full_execution_context_t seems to only be used in the dom0
> interface.
>
> The in-Xen analog to full_execution_context_t is arch_exec_domain, with
> many fields duplicated between the two. Could we consolidate these, or
> at least give full_execution_context_t a name that better describes its
> purpose?
Yes, that's another one that's gross. Maybe rename 
full_execution_context_t to execution_context_t, and rename existing 
execution_context_t to something else (cpu_reg_t, or something like 
that)?
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel