[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] crash on starting new domain (e1000 appears to be the problem)


  • To: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:04:07 +1000
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:04:10 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcU5mURWBOZZ65qCSwWmZHIF3giitwAAJgQAAAQE6XAAjUiBEA==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] crash on starting new domain (e1000 appears to be the problem)

Doh. I tried switching network drivers from e1000 to tlan, and
everything appears to work fine now. Anyone else using intel 1gb network
cards?

james

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:41
> To: James Harper; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] crash on starting new domain
> 
> 
> Can you reproduce this with a 2.0-testing kernel? Are you sure your
> iscsi modules were actually built against this kernel version?
> 
> Ian
> 
> > Okay it wasn't hung afterall, it just took a while to reboot.
> > I've managed to get an oops dump from the console:
> >
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> > c7e70000 printing eip:
> > c88eadbb
> > *pde = ma 0141d067 pa 0001d067
> > *pte = ma 00000000 pa 55555000
> >  [pg0+140185564/1003249664]
> > journal_commit_transaction+0xc3c/0xf80 [jbd]
> > [autoremove_wake_function+0/96]
> > autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60  [find_get_page+39/80]
> > find_get_page+0x27/0x50  [autoremove_wake_function+0/96]
> > autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60  [pg0+140194829/1003249664]
> > kjournald+0xcd/0x1f0 [jbd]  [autoremove_wake_function+0/96]
> > autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> > [autoremove_wake_function+0/96]
> > autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60  [ret_from_fork+6/28]
> > ret_from_fork+0x6/0x1c  [pg0+140194592/1003249664]
> > commit_timeout+0x0/0x10 [jbd]  [pg0+140194624/1003249664]
> > kjournald+0x0/0x1f0 [jbd]  [kernel_thread_helper+5/16]
> > kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
> > Oops: 0002 [#1]
> > Modules linked in: nfsd exportfs lockd sunrpc tlan 8021q loop
> > ext3 jbd mbcache crc32c libcrc32c iscsi_sfnet
> > scsi_transport_iscsi dm_mod sd_mod scsi_mod e1000 eepro100
> > CPU:    0
> > EIP:    0061:[pg0+140197307/1003249664]    Not tainted VLI
> > EFLAGS: 00011206   (2.6.10-xen0)
> > EIP is at journal_get_descriptor_buffer+0x6b/0xb0 [jbd]
> > eax: 00000000   ebx: c757eb3c   ecx: 00000400   edx: 00001000
> > esi: 00000000   edi: c7e70000   ebp: c79bbec0   esp: c797bdc0
> > ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0069
> > Process kjournald (pid: 856, threadinfo=c797a000 task=c1288a60)
> > Stack: c05b81c0 00000624 00001000 00000624 c6eae92c c61ce920
> > c72baf8c 00000000 <I stopped cleaning it up at this point>
> >                                                  Apr  6 01:41:52
xen1
> > kernel:        c88e7fdc c79bbec0 c61ce920 00000008 00000622 c10f6a60
> > c797a000 c797a000
> >
> > Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:        00000000 00000000
> > 00000000 00000000
> > 00000000 c6eaec8c 00000622 00000000
> >                          Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel: Call Trace:
> >
> >    Apr  6
> > 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:  [pg0+140185564/1003249664]
> > journal_commit_transaction+0xc3c/0xf80 [jbd]
> >       Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:
> > [autoremove_wake_function+0/96] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> >                      Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:
> > [find_get_page+39/80] find_get_page+0x27/0x50
> >                 Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:
> > [autoremove_wake_function+0/96] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> >                                Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:
> > [pg0+140194829/1003249664] kjournald+0xcd/0x1f0 [jbd]
> >                                   Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:
> > [autoremove_wake_function+0/96] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> >                                                  Apr  6 01:41:52
xen1
> > kernel:  [autoremove_wake_function+0/96]
> > autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> >                                                                 Apr
6
> > 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:  [ret_from_fork+6/28] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x1c
> >                                                          Apr
> > 6 01:41:52
> > xen1 kernel:  [pg0+140194592/1003249664] commit_timeout+0x0/0x10
[jbd]
> >                                                                Apr
6
> > 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:  [pg0+140194624/1003249664]
> > kjournald+0x0/0x1f0 [jbd]
> >
> >    Apr  6
> > 01:41:52 xen1 kernel:  [kernel_thread_helper+5/16]
> > kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
> >
> > Apr  6 01:41:52 xen1 kernel: Code: 04 8b 85 88 00 00 00 89 04
> > 24 e8 11 8e 86 f7 89 c3 0f ba 28 02 19 c0 85 c0 75 46 8b 95
> > 8c 00 00 00 89 f0 8b 7b 18 89 d1 c1 e9 02 <f3> ab f6 c2 02 74
> > 02 66 ab f6 c2 01 74 01 aa 0f ba 2b 00 89 d8
> >
> > ipt_limit
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> > > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Harper
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2005 14:38
> > > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [Xen-devel] crash on starting new domain
> > >
> > > I've just built some shiny xen 2.0.5 kernel packages for
> > debian using
> > > the stuff in 'experimental', and cannot seem to create a new
domain.
> > The
> > > whole machine just reboots. I've caught the first line of a kernel
> > oops
> > > but haven't got physical access to the machine at the moment.
> > >
> > > The console of the domain looks like this:
> > >
> > > Adding 262136k swap on /dev/hda2.  Priority:-1 extents:1 EXT3-fs
> > > warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is
> > recommended
> > > EXT3 FS on hda1, internal journal
> > > hwclock is unable to get I/O port access:  the iopl(3) call
failed.
> > > System time was Tue Apr  5 15:31:42 UTC 2005.
> > > Setting the System Clock using the Hardware Clock as reference...
> > > hwclock is unable to get I/O port access:  the iopl(3) call
failed.
> > > SysteSegmentation fault
> > >
> > > Any ideas? It's an SMP machine if that makes any
> > difference. The exact
> > > same setup was working a few stable versions ago. It's just
decided
> > not
> > > to reboot anymore so I'll have to get someone in the office
> > to reboot
> > it
> > > for me.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.